Sunday, November 7, 2010

Boks Beat Ireland

Smooth landing: Gio Aplon scores against Ireland at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin on Saturday evening. (Peter Morrison, AP) Read more.

Comment: And Gio was able to score despite having no legs at all!

Damn.  Ireland must really suck at rugby.

Just jiving boeta D. I gots a great internet connection here at the hotel broer hence the multiple posts today ;0)

Onward! to real broadband in South Africa ... for real.

Caption and Picture Credits

Kenyan Women Take First and Third in the NY Marathon

Kenya's Edna Kiplagat won the New York City women's marathon on Sunday in an unofficial two hours 28 minutes 20 seconds to celebrate her debut in the year's final big city marathon.  Read more here.
 
Comment: Ummmm ... I ran for 20 minutes in Nairobi today.

Well OK it was just on a treadmill in my hotel's gym.  Yeah yeah I know. 

I'm just so inspired to be perspiring here in the land of running champions and marathon legends.

Maybe I should try for 25 or even 40 minutes tomorrow!

Maybe not ... I gots work to do and it does not include nursing injuries.  ;0)

Article and Picture credits

MP Ruto Wants Kenya's President and Prime Minister Charged by ICC

By Murithi Mutiga
Sunday Nation
November 7, 2010.

Eldoret North MP William Ruto wants the International Criminal Court to indict President Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga for the roles he says they played in the post-election violence.
William Ruto
In a statement that could form the core of Mr Ruto’s defence at The Hague, one of the suspended minister’s lawyers says the process of securing justice would have no credibility if Mr Kibaki and Mr Odinga are not charged.

“It is the general feeling and mood of the country that those with the highest responsibility be held to account for the loss of life and property,” Katwa Kigen said.

“In that regard the investigations should start with the President and the Prime Minister as the people fought because of them… before moving down the ladder to those who played various roles.”

Mr Ruto’s line of defence adds a new twist to the search for justice for the estimated 1,300 people who lost their lives in the orgy of violence that followed the controversial 2007 General Election.

By opting to present himself to prosecutors at The Hague, Mr Ruto appears to have thrown the top political leadership into a spin because the terms of any deal he might cut with the ICC are unclear.

Read the rest of this story here.

Comment: I am catching up on Kenyan political news in what is a relatively cool and wet Nairobi afternoon.

The other big news story is about a policeman who shot and killed 10 people in an apparent love triangle late last night in Siakago which is "90 miles (150 kilometers) northeast of the capital, Nairobi."

See the story here.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

How can you Negroes pursue "happiness" when you are rioting?


Looks like you Negroes are rioting out in Oaktown. (I prefer the term uprising) And, to think, the Raiders didn't even win the Superbowl. Negroes hate what they perceive as injustice. Two years in the big house for Oscar Grant's killer doesn't sit well; as it shouldn't, but riots? I don't know.

If it were up to me I would find other s&*t to riot about: like these past mid-term elections, and the constant fear mongering and race baiting used by some poli-tricksters to get elected. If we really want to loot and burn s*&t in our neighborhoods we should be burning the liquor stores and the broken down schools that keep churning out kids who can't master the basics in education. Not to mention that mega churches who just take and never give back. But that's just me. Not that I am condoning violence or anything. I am speaking in strictly in hypothetical terms here.

(BTW, FOX NEWS studios are in New York. I am just sayin. )

Anywhooo, one of the problems I have with these uprisings, is that they always seem to be centered around the areas where the people doing the protesting actually live. Why not take the "ruckus" uptown? I am not too familiar with the Bay Area, so someone has to help me with this question: Is the East Oakland Lake Merritt part of that city predominantly black and poor? If it is, you Negroes seem to be following a very bad pattern.

Uprisings get people's attention every now and then, they were very effective in the sixties. [To get our attention]Although, sadly, some of the solutions folks tried to come up with after A-merry-ca's eyes were opened didn't necessarily give us the best results. Hopefully we won't go back to those days here in A-merry-ca. [ And it wasn't always the Negroes] Hopefully. But as wealth and justice gets more scarce every day, the natives continue to get more restless. Seems like it's too much for even us happy and seemingly content A-merry-cans to take.

You can only pursue happiness for so long. At some point the pursuit will stop.


Airports and Malema as Narrative

I am sitting at Oliver Tambo International waiting to board my 2pm fight to Kenya.  In about six hours I will be in Nairobi for the next 22 days.

The social scientist in me likes airports as much as any other temporary place/space where people gather to do the 'business' of moving through.

Most airports are the same.  Even the travelers seem the same as they go about the motions of arriving and departing.

I have been thinking about the manner in which spaces and bodies relate, or rather narrate, stories.

More specifically, I have been thinking about the manner in which political spaces and political bodies narrate political events and political outcomes.

The African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL) leader, Julius Malema, is a prominent political body.

His body travels through the political space that is post-apartheid South Africa quite frequently and very prominetly.

Like him or loathe him.  Malema cannot easily be ignored.  Some of the baggage he carries is his own, most not.

Some of the travel is of his own making.  Most is not.

In recent days Malema has publically referred to the white leader of the Democratic Alliance, Helen Zille, as a "cockroach" in the presence of President Jacob Zuma.

His comment opened up a contentious and fiery debate about the limits of free speech.

"Is this not hate speech," a colleague enquired?

"He is saying that all whites are cockroaches and should be eliminated like pests," a white caller to a local radio show said angrily.

"Africans do not see cockroaches as dirty.  He was referring to her will to survive and multiply her message," a black caller responded.

"Saying she is an insect is just wrong.  No-one likes a cockroach.  The Nazis called the Jews cockroaches before they sent them to gas chambers," an elderly immigrant to these shores complained.

In the middle of the noise sits Malema.

Some of what he has stirred is understood.  Most not.

South Africa's vice-president rebuked him for being rude.

"Aaaah man the vice-prez is just saying so because the white people want the governemnt to say something.  They know, and we know, that Zille is a cockroach," a student intern told me.

And so the narrative drawn from Malema, but mostly from around him gathers.

Some have made it known that his right to free speech is absolute even if many thought his comment was inappropriate.

Others just cannot find the reason to see reason in Malema.

"He is a hateful so and so.  His eyes tell just how much he hates whites," I heard an older white woman say once.

Malema has moved on.  Checked his bags so to speak.

Next week or even later on today he will make another controversial comment and draw praise and ire and apathy all at the same time.

The actual events may be the same but the narrative will not, well not until the political space is forever changed.

It is for the same reason that airports anywhere are mostly like airports everywhere.

There are types of travelers that inhabit this space.  You know them.  You've seen them.

As long as there are passengers there will departures and arrivals and the narrative of traveling will be the same, mostly.

Malema's political narrative is not unique.  His story is not his own and certainly not reflective of his own making, mostly.

His eyes, like the old white lady above commented, tells a story that was foretold before he was born into this structure, this political space.

In my present airport space the crying baby three tables across from me has been here and elsewhere before.  It is a familiar story of tired parents and increasingly irritated co-travelers.

I am just hoping, praying in fact, that the poor mother and her baby are not seated next to me or even close to me.

I think the same story is true for just about every one of us sitting in this lounge as we wait to depart. ;0)

Onward!

Friday, November 5, 2010

MSNBC did what? And some other things on my mind.


So let me get this straight; MSNBC suspends Keith Olbermann for donating money to dumbocratic candidates, and their rivals, Radio Rwanda, allows their on air personalities to run for republican office? I swear liberals are getting softer and softer by the day. You all have got to get hard core like the republiclowns. Do you think Radio Rwanda would fire one of their biggest earners over some s^&t like this? Hell News Corp gave over a million dollars to that racist- right out of central casting- Haley Barbour, and didn't even sweat it.

Still, like Aaron Goldstein, I smell a rat. You know the world is upside down when conservatives are ripping MSNBC for suspending Olbermann.

"Perhaps Olbermann violated NBC News “policy and standards.” But NBC doesn’t have real news standards for MSNBC—otherwise the channel wouldn’t exist. It’s a little strange to get all high and mighty now.

But there’s now a Republican House, and perhaps GE is trying to curry favor by dumping Olbermann?"

The moon must be blue tonight, because I agree with the wingnut thinker, Bill Kristol, on this one.

Only two years for Johannes Mehserle? Sorry Oscar, maybe if you were a dog your killer would have gotten more time. Hey, that's what Michael Vick got for killing dogs. I am just sayin.

But I don't want to turn this into another one of those kinds of posts. Now that we are living in post racial A-merry-ca it wouldn't be cool. Wait....

Finally, the republiclowns were up in arms about this 200 million dollar a day trip his O ness is taking to India. (That doesn't even sound right. It costs 190 million to keep a thousand troops in Afghanistan every day.) Well, as is often the case with wingnuts, it turns out that they were wrong. This, of course, didn't stop the wingnut media machine from parroting this false story for the last couple of days. It's what they do. Turns out the source of the cost to A-merry-ca for an A-merry-can president's trip, was an Indian official who told this to an Indian news outlet. Let that sink in for a minute.....

"According to FactCheck, the rumor originated in a Nov 02 article in the Press Trust of India, which cited an anonymous "top official" in one of India's local governments as the source. The figure quickly spread online and was picked up by the Drudge Report, Rush Limbaugh and Rep Michele Bachmann, who complained about it on Anderson Cooper last night. When Cooper challenged Bachmann on the figures, the Minnesota rep was ready with a response: "Well these are the numbers that have been coming out in the press," Bachmann answered..." [Story]

A-merry-ca, what have you done?

Vandana Shiva: Time to End War Against the Earth

The Age
November 4, 2010

When we think of wars in our times, our minds turn to Iraq and Afghanistan. But the bigger war is the war against the planet. This war has its roots in an economy that fails to respect ecological and ethical limits - limits to inequality, limits to injustice, limits to greed and economic concentration.

A handful of corporations and of powerful countries seeks to control the earth's resources and transform the planet into a supermarket in which everything is for sale. They want to sell our water, genes, cells, organs, knowledge, cultures and future.

Dr. Vandana Shiva
The continuing wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and onwards are not only about "blood for oil". As they unfold, we will see that they are about blood for food, blood for genes and biodiversity and blood for water.

The war mentality underlying military-industrial agriculture is evident from the names of Monsanto's herbicides - ''Round-Up'', ''Machete'', ''Lasso''. American Home Products, which has merged with Monsanto, gives its herbicides similarly aggressive names, including ''Pentagon'' and ''Squadron''.This is the language of war. Sustainability is based on peace with the earth.

The war against the earth begins in the mind. Violent thoughts shape violent actions. Violent categories construct violent tools. And nowhere is this more vivid than in the metaphors and methods on which industrial, agricultural and food production is based. Factories that produced poisons and explosives to kill people during wars were transformed into factories producing agri-chemicals after the wars.

The year 1984 woke me up to the fact that something was terribly wrong with the way food was produced. With the violence in Punjab and the disaster in Bhopal, agriculture looked like war. That is when I wrote The Violence of the Green Revolution and why I started Navdanya as a movement for an agriculture free of poisons and toxics.

Pesticides, which started as war chemicals, have failed to control pests. Genetic engineering was supposed to provide an alternative to toxic chemicals. Instead, it has led to increased use of pesticides and herbicides and unleashed a war against farmers.

The high-cost feeds and high-cost chemicals are trapping farmers in debt - and the debt trap is pushing farmers to suicide. According to official data, more than 200,000 Indian farmers have committed suicide in India since 1997.

Making peace with the earth was always an ethical and ecological imperative. It has now become a survival imperative for our species.

Violence to the soil, to biodiversity, to water, to atmosphere, to farms and farmers produces a warlike food system that is unable to feed people. One billion people are hungry. Two billion suffer food-related diseases - obesity, diabetes, hypertension and cancers.

There are three levels of violence involved in non-sustainable development. The first is the violence against the earth, which is expressed as the ecological crisis. The second is the violence against people, which is expressed as poverty, destitution and displacement. The third is the violence of war and conflict, as the powerful reach for the resources that lie in other communities and countries for their limitless appetites.

When every aspect of life is commercialised, living becomes more costly, and people are poor, even if they earn more than a dollar a day. On the other hand, people can be affluent in material terms, even without the money economy, if they have access to land, their soils are fertile, their rivers flow clean, their cultures are rich and carry traditions of producing beautiful homes and clothing and delicious food, and there is social cohesion, solidarity and spirit of community.

The elevation of the domain of the market, and money as man-made capital, to the position of the highest organising principle for societies and the only measure of our well-being has led to the undermining of the processes that maintain and sustain life in nature and society.

The richer we get, the poorer we become ecologically and culturally. The growth of affluence, measured in money, is leading to a growth in poverty at the material, cultural, ecological and spiritual levels.

The real currency of life is life itself and this view raises questions: how do we look at ourselves in this world? 

What are humans for? And are we merely a money-making and resource-guzzling machine? Or do we have a higher purpose, a higher end?

I believe that ''earth democracy'' enables us to envision and create living democracies based on the intrinsic worth of all species, all peoples, all cultures - a just and equal sharing of this earth's vital resources, and sharing the decisions about the use of the earth's resources.

Earth democracy protects the ecological processes that maintain life and the fundamental human rights that are the basis of the right to life, including the right to water, food, health, education, jobs and livelihoods.

We have to make a choice. Will we obey the market laws of corporate greed or Gaia's laws for maintenance of the earth's ecosystems and the diversity of its beings?

People's need for food and water can be met only if nature's capacity to provide food and water is protected. Dead soils and dead rivers cannot give food and water.

Defending the rights of Mother Earth is therefore the most important human rights and social justice struggle. It is the broadest peace movement of our times.

Dr Vandana Shiva is an Indian physicist, environmentalist and recipient of the 2010 Sydney Peace Prize. This is an edited version of her speech at the Sydney Opera House last night.

Picture Credit