Thursday, December 3, 2009

Pausing

Gentle readers (all three of you ;) I am taking some time off from posting here.

The term has ended here in Mzansi and I am off to spend time with moms. Mita and I will start that journey tomorrow morning.

Thank you for reading this year.

Peace and struggle to yaz.

Ridwan

ummm Erica the Norton Commando above can fit under my tree ;)

Picture Credit

Monday, November 30, 2009

"Australia's Apartheid: Return to a secret country"

by John Pilger
26 November, 2009
Newstatesman
I remember the boys dressed in army surplus, the girls in hessian, their silhouettes framed in beach shanties, staring across an abyss. You were not meant to talk about them. They were not counted in the census, unlike the sheep, and anyway were dirty and feckless and dying off.

You were not meant to disturb the surface of our great southern idyll, sun-kissed and God-blessed, in circumstances that might raise questions of race. At high school, I studied a celebrated historian, Russel Ward, who wrote: “We are civilized and they are not.” They were the first Australians. At least he mentioned them. Other text books simply left them out.

Today, almost everything has changed and has not changed. For many Aboriginal people, who value healing, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s apology last year was important. They and their white allies had worked tirelessly for the mere word to be uttered. The resistance was formidable; white supremacist politicians, journalists and academics damned the “black armband version of our history”. And when Rudd finally said it, the Sydney Morning Herald described the apology as “a piece of political wreckage” that “the Rudd government has moved quickly to clear away... in a way that responds to some of its supporters’ emotional needs”.

Australia's apartheid

There is to be no compensation for those thousands of Aborigines wrenched from their families as children, known as the stolen generation. The previous, openly racist government’s “intervention” into Aboriginal lands in the Northern Territory is being consolidated. In 2007, on the pretext that Aboriginal children were being sexually abused in “unthinkable numbers”, the government of John Howard suspended the Racial Discrimination Act and sent the army and “business managers” to take over black communities.

Within a year, barely reported statistics revealed how bogus it all was. Out of 7433 Aboriginal children examined by doctors, a maximum of four possible cases of sexual abuse were identified. The Australian Crimes Commission found no evidence of paedophile rings. What they found they already knew: poverty and sickness on the scale of Africa and India.

Since Rudd’s apology, Aboriginal poverty indicators have gone backwards. His “Closing the Gap” programme is a grim joke, having produced not a single new housing project. An undeclared agenda is straight from Australia’s colonial past: a land grab combined with an almost prurient need to control, harass and blame a people who have refused to die off, whose genius is their understanding of an ancient land that still perplexes and threatens white authority. Whenever Canberra’s politicians want to look “tough” they give the Aborigines a good kicking: it is a ritual as sacred as Don Bradman worship or Anzac Day.

The indigenous affairs minister, Jenny Macklin, has decreed that unless certain communities hand over their precious freehold leases they will be denied basic services. The Northern Territory contains abundant mineral wealth, such as uranium, and has long been eyed by multinationals as a lucrative radioactive waste dump. The blacks are in the way, yet again: so it is time for the usual feigned innocence. Rudd has said his government “doesn’t have a clear idea of what’s happening on the ground” in Aboriginal Australia. What? The reports of learned studies pour forth as if the sorcerer’s apprentice is loose. One example: the rate of incarceration of black Australians is five times that of South Africa during the last years of apartheid. The state of Western Australia imprisons Aboriginal men at eight times the apartheid figure, an Aussie world record.

On 16 November, a 12-year-old Aboriginal boy appeared in court charged with receiving a Freddo Frog chocolate bar from a friend who had allegedly taken it from a supermarket. The supermarket did not seek prosecution. Only the international headlines forced the police to drop the case. Two thirds of Aboriginal children who have contact with the police are jailed; two thirds of white children are cautioned. A young Aboriginal man was jailed for a year for stealing £12 worth of biscuits and soft drink.

A mattress in the desert

In my lifetime, Australia has become one of the most culturally diverse places on earth, and it has happened peacefully, by and large. This proud achievement fades when you drive into a country town and pass the funerals of the native people, many of them young, who take their own lives. The whispering in Antipodean hearts is race. The navy is sent against leaking boats filled with desperate refugees, Tamils, Iraqis and Afghans, and if they cannot be dumped behind razor wire somewhere in Indonesia, they are isolated on Christmas Island which, for the purpose, has been “excised” from the Australian map by a legal sleight of hand. How clever.

While I have been in Australia, Irene Khan, Amnesty’s secretary general, an experienced witness of poverty and discrimination, has been travelling through the vast outback region known as Utopia. The roads are dirt; water trickles from a single standpipe in many communities. She saw children, their eyes streaming and coughs hacking. She met Elsie, who sleeps on a mattress in the desert, yet pays rent to the government. Shocking, she says.

There is currently a liberal clarion call in Australia for a Bill of Rights, and the republican movement is stirring again. These debates are meaningless until white Australia summons the moral and political imagination to offer its first people a genuine treaty, as well as universal land rights and a proper share of the country’s resources. And respect. Only then will this fortunate society earn the respect it so often craves by other means.
On 4 November 2009, John Pilger received the Sydney Peace Prize, Australia’s international human rights award. A Secret Country, his best-selling history of Australia published 20 years ago, remains in print (Vintage Books).

Image Credit

Friday, November 27, 2009

IOL News: "Dad forced to search through dead babies"

A father has today written to the Minister of Health complaining about the treatment of his pregnant wife and how after their baby son died he had to search through 40 dead babies to find his child at Johannesburg's Coronation Hospital.
Read the rest of the article here.

Comment: This is heartbreaking! Have we become so heartless, so depraved?

Before President Zuma became president, and before he was charged with rape and then controversially acquitted, he was put in charge of what is termed "moral regeneration".

He obviously failed. In total.

Still, I wonder how much "moral regeneration" is needed in Mzansi? What will it take to bring back the idealized shine so many struggled for, and too many died for?

How many more tragedies like this before we step back and ask serious questions about our make-up?

I was shocked to read this article but not surprised.

Life in South Africa, like the state of nature Hobbes described, has become violent, brutish, and short.

Our state hospitals are in an absolute shambles. Our social services and just about every other aspect of public life is held hostage to thievery and corruption that rivals the era of white rule.

And, even while we speak of service delivery the most visible delivery has been a fast-tracking of fat-cat status to political elites who dicker over personal expense packages and million rand luxury cars.

F*ck Affirmative Action and Black Empowerment! And save me the sh*t about the white man and his racism!

We have been corrupted in total and the masses lay impoverished, still!

What 'freedom' lives and feels like this?

What's going on before we take up arms again?

Onward!

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Violence Against Women

The caption to this News24 picture reads:
SPEAKING OUT: A woman walks with her face partially covered during a march for International Day of (sic) the Elimination of Violence Against Women in Colombia. (Fernando Vergara, AP)
Resolution 54/134 (December 17, 1999) of the UN General Assembly designates November 25 as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.

Article 2 defines violence against women to include, among other forms, the following:
(a) Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring in the family, including battering, sexual abuse of female children in the household, dowry-related violence, marital rape, female genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-spousal violence and violence related to exploitation;

(b) Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the general community, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educational institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution;

(c) Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs.
When South Africa held its Truth and Reconciliation hearings the issue of state sanctioned violence against women was mostly ignored.

Rape as an apartheid tool, for example, is hardly interrogated anywhere in our post-apartheid consciousness.

Can it be that the appalling levels of violence and general degradation that women continue to suffer explains some of this troubling omission?

Onward!

Ps. In South Africa a woman is killed every 6 hours by an intimate partner according to the United Nations Development Fund For Women (see their Fact Sheet for more information).

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

"Cruel Britannia: British Complicity in the Torture and Ill-treatment of Terror Suspects in Pakistan"

Human Rights Watch today released a 46 page report that documents British "complicity" in the torture of "five UK citizens of Pakistani origin ..."

Read the report here.

Read the Guardian cover article entitled 'Cruel, illegal, immoral': Human Rights Watch condemns UK's role in torture here.

Also, Eric Walberg in an article entitled Canada’s Guantanamo reports that:
Canada’s chief diplomat in Kandahar in 2006-07, Richard Colvin, who told a House of Commons committee on Afghanistan that Afghans arrested by Canadian military and handed over to Afghan authorities were knowingly tortured.
Read the rest of the article here.

Mmmmmm ... so much for the link between western-style democracy and the respect for human rights.

Onward!

South Africa Deports Israeli Airline Official

South Africa deported an Israeli airline official last week following allegations that Israel’s secret police, the Shin Bet, had infiltrated Johannesburg international airport in an effort to gather information on South African citizens, particularly black and Muslim travellers.

The move by the South African government followed an investigation by local TV showing an undercover reporter being illegally interrogated by an official with El Al, Israel’s national carrier, in a public area of Johannesburg’s OR Tambo airport.

The programme also featured testimony from Jonathan Garb, a former El Al guard, who claimed that the airline company had been a front for the Shin Bet in South Africa for many years.

Of the footage of the undercover reporter’s questioning, he commented: “Here is a secret service operating above the law in South Africa. We pull the wool over everyone’s eyes. We do exactly what we want. The local authorities do not know what we are doing.”
Read the rest of Jonathan Cook's article in Dissident Voice here.

Monday, November 23, 2009

"Encountering Ambedkar In Hungary"

By Pardeep Attri
22 November, 2009
Countercurrents.org
The Romas, a discriminated minority in Hungary, turn to Ambedkar and Buddhism in their quest for dignity and equality. Pardeep Attri journeys to Sajókaza and Budapest to find out how the Dalits and Romas connect.
Read the rest of the article here.

See this site for more information on Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (pictured above).

Onward!

Picture Credit

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Killing A Bull With Your Bare Hands In The Name Of Culture

Last week I listened to a radio interview with a man from Kwazulu-Natal who was describing and defending the First Fruits festival known as Ukweshwama.

Times columnist Fred Khumalo describes Ukweshwama as a ritual:

"... observed by people of Nguni stock, including Zulus, Swazis, and Ndebeles - which involves about 40 young men killing a bull with their bare hands.

There is a belief that the warriors inherit the bull's strength and power when the beast is killed. When the warriors salute the king upon completion of their mission, the power is transferred to the king and his kingdom.

Another explanation for the ritual is that, by killing the beast, the young warriors form a bond of trust and commitment to each other, a sentiment they then transfer to their other peers, creating a strong manhood in the kingdom in question."
Khumalo, a Zulu, goes on to argue that the practice is cruel and should not be supported simply because it is said to be a cultural right.

Ukweshwama rituals have largely been absent in South Africa in the last five or so decades.

Khumalo points out that the ritual has been revived and that its interpretation is at odds with the progress we have made as a nation.

PETA says on its website that:
"... during the festival of Ukweshwama, a group of youths torment and slaughter a terrified bull with their bare hands. They rip out the bull's tongue, shove handfuls of dirt into his mouth, tear out his eyes, and mutilate his genitals."
The man being interviewed was indignant that non-Africans, including Indian politician Maneka Gandhi who is associated with PETA, was calling on President Zuma to condemn the practice.

Just yesterday The Star (print edition) ran an opinion piece by University of Cape Town philosophy professor, David Benatar, entitled "Culture does not justify cruelty".

Like Khumalo, Benatar presses the point that just because a practice is deemed a cultural ritual does not mean it is not cruel.

Benatar is careful to explain that he views the slaughter of animals for purposes of eating as "wrong" too but he argued further that "the dismembering of a live bull is still worse and thus deserves special criticism."

I agree with Khumalo and Benatar.

Culture cannot be treated as static. Times and circumstances change and culture is not immune.

I do not expect that President Zuma, who is a Zulu, will respond to Mrs Gandhi's call. This is tricky political terrain that is best left alone or rather, ignored.

There are many insistent voices who purport to represent Africans who say that outsiders interfering with their cultural practices amounts to racism.

Nonsense is my thinking.

There is no racism in calling the act barbaric. The act is simply an outdated and cruel practice any way you slice it.

The same is true for bull fighting.

Killing a bull with your bare hands or as a sworded matador does not make you a man or brave, it just makes you a cruel f*ck and cruelty knows no skin color in these terms.

The practice should be banned and the elders of the communities concerned should sit together to figure out a more humane rites of passage ceremony.

Onward!

Picture Credit

UPDATE(November 24): Animal Rights Africa appeals to high court to stop Ukweshwama ritual.
Animal Rights Africa (ARA) will be going to the High Court in Pietermaritzburg on the 24th November 2009 to try and end the extremely cruel Ukweshwama ritual, which is due to take place on the 5th December in at Nongoma, KwaZulu-Natal, during the First Fruits Festival. Said ARA spokesperson Michele Pickover, "It physically pains us and is an affront to our dignity that an animal is made to suffer in such an overtly cruel and protracted way. "
Read the rest of the press release here.

Also, see the Mail & Guardian article(November 24) entitled "Bull-killing ritual to be debated in Durban".

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Intern Muslims ... save America!

American history is littered with constructions and reconstructions of the racialized villain(s) that stand against the ubiquitous "good guys".

I have recently been thinking how the paranoid ramblings about Islamic terrorists after the Fort Hood massacre is starting to read and feel like the same racist paranoia that led to the mass internment of Japanese Americans after the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941.

In the days after the Pearl Harbor attack racist speculation cast Japanese Americans as 'ideological instruments' and racial allies of Japan

The media joined an assortment of racist civic organizations to depict Japanese Americans as traitors who were plotting the downfall of the US.

The US government went the next step to label Japanese Americans, citizens and residents alike, as "enemy aliens".

The US then ordered that Japanese Americans living on the West Coast be rounded up and placed into "War Relocation Camps".

These camps were nothing more than concentration camps and by 1942 about 120 000 Japanese Americans had been forcefully relocated.

No formal charges were brought. The 'fact' of suspicion fueled by racist hate and lies in the US media and among its elected leaders and citizen groups was enough.

I have co-written an academic article that covers some of the tragedy I am describing here.

My co-author and I describe the fallout that led to the internment in this way:
The combination of racism fuelled by anger produced a highly volatile
situation. The consequences for Japanese Americans extended outside of the interpersonal realm into the arena of business and their professional lives.
Banks in California refused to do business with Japanese Americans. Their accounts were frozen and they were not allowed to draw any money. Japanese Americans were turned away from grocery stores, convenience stores, and other basic service providers. The state of California rescinded the certification of doctors to practice medicine and of lawyers to practice law. Japanese Americans who owned businesses lost their customers and clients. The stigma of assumed betrayal was used to deprive Japanese Americans of the right to make a living and to live without fear of reprisals from angry mobs. Hardship and uncertainty grew as Japanese Americans struggled to provide basic necessities for themselves and their families.

Political leaders throughout the country joined pressure groups that were
venting anger and calling for reprisals against Japanese Americans. Senator Tom
Stewart joined congressmen John Rankin of Mississippi and Martin Dies of Texas in
a campaign of racist rhetoric that was intended to advance their beliefs in white
supremacy. Congressman Rankin, who was notoriously known for being anti-black
and anti-semitic described World War II as a “race war” that inevitable pitted the
“white man’s civilization (against) Japanese barbarism” in a duel in which “one of
them must be destroyed.” He added that the Japanese “are pagan in their
philosophy, atheistic in their beliefs, alien in their allegiance, and antagonistic to everything for which we stand.” His comments were intended to caste suspicion
onto Japanese Americans when he said: “Once a Jap always a Jap. You cannot
change him. You cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.” Rankin’s comments
received ardent support from congressional leaders in Arkansas, Virginia, and West
Virginia.
Just this morning the disturbing themes contained in these two paragraphs replayed inside my head as I read an article in the Los Angeles Times by conservative commentator, Jennifer Rubin.

Much of Rubin's article is that there is too much "political correctness" in the argument that Islam is a peaceful religion. She presses the argument made by Cliff May of the National Review Online, that most Muslims may be peaceful but it is Islam that nonetheless fuels the violence of jihadists (whatever that term may mean).

What absolute nonsense!

Please show me anywhere in the Qur'an where Muslims are led to become jihadists.

The fact that Islam prescribes peace over war and violence as an absolute last resort is conveniently written out of the consciousness of folks like Rubin and May.

And there are so many others that are too eager to follow the course of American history and demonize away.

Take a look at the disturbing comments that accompany Rubin's article and you will get a greater appreciation of what I mean.

The falsified and racist thesis that would portray Muslims as "enemy aliens" is captured in the following comments:
YOU CANNOT SINCERELY TAKE AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION AND SIMULTANEOUSLY CLAIM TO BE AN OBSERVANT MUSLIM.

also;

In the words of Pogo Possum: "We have met the enemy, and he is us." At the very least, he is within our own ranks. Sacrificing the hunt for fifth columnists on the altar of political correctness does not ensure anyone's liberty or due process. It's time we root out those who intend to do us harm, and call them for what they are: enemies. Those who do not wish to be counted among their ranks need to stand up and be counted among those who are not.

and;

We have seen numerous incidents of mohammedans killing their fellow soldiers in the US Army. We have seen the majority of mohammedans keep silent rather than oppose the radicals who promote this insanity in the name of religion. Perhaps it's time for the US to rethink the notion of freedom of religion.
This last comment scratches deep to dredge up the derogatory term "mohammedans" as opposed to Muslims.

What is most striking is the constant refrain that other 'Muslims must stand up' and testify against jihadists and so they will be known.

Because, as it stands now, any law-abiding Muslim who is quiet is an enemy that wants to overthrow the "good guys".

The first comment above is most emphatic that Islam/Muslims are not compatible with the constitution (read the US).

In other words, you cannot be a Muslim and an American at the same time.

And, if you accept Rubin and May's thinking, it would be wise to remain vigilant against Islam wherever it is found, inside and outside the US.

The internment of Japanese Americans started with the seizure of assets and the freezing of bank accounts.

Last week the US started seizing assets belonging to Muslims who are allegedly tied to the government of Iran.

America it seems is yet to learn the racist folly of its ways.

I don't expect that Muslim internment camps will crop up on the mainland.

But who can reasonably argue that Guantanamo is not the 'new' internment camp, and even worse?

And what about the so called "black sites" that are spread anonymously across the globe for the purposes of containing the "enemy alien" inside and outside the imperial beast?

These are not times for complacency.

The internment of Muslims is well on its way.

Onward!

The Apologizing Habit

Credit

Friday, November 13, 2009

Marwa El-Sherbini Killed In Germany For Being A Muslim

Marwa el-Sherbini decided to take her two-year old son, Mustafa, to a children's playground in the city of Dresden, Germany, one afternoon in August 2008.

Mrs Sherbini (31), an Egyptian born pharmacist who worked for Dresden University, was dressed in blue jeans, a white blouse, and a small headscarf that indicated she was a Muslim according to a news report in the Belfast Telegraph.

Mustafa wanted to play on one of the two swings but both were being used.

One of the swings was occupied by a grown man who was sitting and smoking a cigarette.

Mrs Sherbini asked the man in German if he would allow Mustafa to play on the swing.

The man immediately went into a rage shouting insults at Mrs Sherbini.

"You are an Islamist and a terrorist who has no business in Germany ..."

He called her a "terrorist whore" who had no right ("business") being in Germany and added that Mustafa would grow up to be a terrorist too.

A witness to the incident called the police and Mrs Sherbini filed a complaint against the man.

Alexander Wiens (28), an unemployed Russian-German was charged with defamation and ordered to pay a €330 fine by a Dresden district court three months after the incident.

He refused to pay the fine saying he was being "unfairly treated" and he appeared in court July 1, 2009, to appeal the fine.

Mrs Sherbini's and her Egyptian husband, Elwy Ali Okaz, were in court when Wiens pulled out a 12-inch knife from a bag.

He then rushed toward Mrs Sherbini and stabbed her 16-times shouting out "You don't deserve to live!"

Elwy Ali Okaz also sustained stab wounds in his attempt to defend his wife.

Mustafa, now three years old, witnessed the murder of his mother in front of judges and other court personnel.

Mrs Sherbini was three months pregnant.

The case hardly caused a stir in Germany while Muslims in Germany and elsewhere were shocked by the brutality and anti-Islamic sentiment.

A funeral prayer ceremony for her in Berlin was attended by more that two thousand Muslims before her body was flown to Cairo for burial according to a news report.

Last week, November 11 to be exact, Wiens was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of Mrs Sherbini and causing grievous bodily harm to Elwy Ali Okaz.

The sentence was read in a Dresden court packed with security personnel unlike the time before when Wiens carried out his ruthless murder.

The sentence also prohibits Wiens from applying for parole after 15 years due to the violent nature of his crime.

The German government released a statement saying that "xenophobia" has no place in Germany.

In my view the sentence is too lenient. The court should have sentenced him to life without parole until death.

I expect that Elwy Ali Okaz may seek to sue the relevant authorities for negligence arising out of the lack of court security.

Whatever the course from here the damage has already been done and there is no turning back so to speak.

Mustafa will no doubt carry life-long scars and that is indeed a great tragedy.

Unfortunately, cases like this are on the rise. Being Muslim in the post-9/11 era means that your security is constantly under threat.

May Mrs Sherbini rest in peace.

Onward!

See Marwa El Sherbiny: The Veiled Martyr for more information.

Picture Credit

Killing Palestinians In The Name of God

Jack Teitel, a 37-year-old settler, is escorted by police officers, into a courtroom in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 12. 2009. Teitel, a Jewish-American extremist, is suspected of carrying out a series of high-profile hate crimes against Arabs, peace activists and a breakaway Jewish sect. (AP Photo/Dan Balilty, October 5, 2009)
Homegrown and exported terrorism ...?

Teitel told reporters in court that "It has been a pleasure and an honor to have served my God".

Now where is the conspiracy-induced condemnation from the American right-wing and its conservative attachments now?

Read background report here.

Onward!

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Floods And Climate Change

The caption to this picture from News24 reads:
"FLOODED:A cyclist wades through floods in northern Tanzania. Flooding in the country has killed at least 20 people following three days of torrential rains. (AFP).

The caption to this picture from the Mail & Guardian reads:
Storm warning: A man walks through a flooded street during rain in Mumbai, India, on Wednesday. Cyclone Phyan moved toward India's western coast as authorities sounded an alert and shut schools and offices in anticipation of its arrival. (Rajanish Kakade, AP)

Last week reports said that my hometown of Kimberley experienced the worst flooding from torrential rains in recorded history.

Many homes were left without electricity for days as emergency crews scrambled to deal with the damage from the floods.

Reports also described the damage done to the habitat of the Lesser Flamingos at Kamfers Dam on the Joburg road leading into Kimberley.

Our world ... she is changing.

Onward!

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Dreams and Ingenuity Despite

South Africa is filled with negative stories about crime, corruption, lack of services, expensive goods, and more.

It is easy to become despondent most of the time.

Just yesterday I about flipped when a driver decided to overtake me in an intersection only to come to a complete halt in front of me.

I wonder at times why folks are in such a hurry to seemingly get nowhere.

Nonetheless,this post is about cheerful dreams.

Well more specifically about the dreams of a young man in the rural area of Limpopo who builds his own cars from scratch and he does so without any formal training.

Augustine Mabasa is a 29 year old brother who lives in Siyandani village. Despite enormous challenges he assembled scrap metal to build an electrical car that can achieve 30kmh.

And it is a sweet looking ride too, don't you think?

I am absolutely amazed at his will to achieve. Most South Africans are not even thinking about electrical cars.

In fact, I am yet to even see a Hybrid (Prius) on the roads.

Augustine says that folks used to laugh at him but I guess they not laughing so hard now that he has won a two-year scholarship (learnership) from Nissan South Africa.

I like his ride. The detail and lines are tight.

This is one cool story.

I want to pause a moment longer and wish the brother all the luck in the world.

Onward!

Story and Picture Credit

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Fort Hood: Islam and Muslims On Trial Already

Today is the third day since Major Nidal Hasan allegedly went on a rampage and took 13 lives and wounded 30 others at Fort Hood.

Muslims living in the US (and elsewhere) expect a backlash and some of the racist baiting has already begun.

To stem the inevitable, the Association Of Patriotic Arab Americans In The Military (APAAM) has released the following statement:
In the aftermath of this terrible tragedy, it is more important than ever that we not make the same scapegoating and broad stroke mistakes that were evident in the aftermath of previous tragedies. The Association of Patriotic Arab Americans in Military urges the media, government officials and all of our fellow Americans to recognize that the actions of Hasan are those of a deranged gunman, and are in no way representative of the wider Arab American or American Muslim community.

In fact, thousands of Arab Americans and American Muslims serve honorably everyday in all four branches of the U.S. military and in the National Guard. ...
Even as APAAM pleads for sanity the almost reflex tendency of the far right to portray Major Hasan's alledged action as a result of Islam, Islamic militancy, terrorism, and of course, jihad, is well on the way.

Here are just two examples of this kind of idiocy emanating from Frontpagemag.com

The magazine's editor, Jamie Glazov, interviewed Dave Gaubatz who is said to be
"the first U.S. civilian (1811) Federal Agent deployed to Iraq in 2003", and "the owner of DG Counter-terrorism Publishing".

In an interview under the headline "The Muslim Brotherhood and Fort Hood" Mr Glazov had this to say:
The murders by Malik Nadal Hasan at Ft. Hood, TX are not a ‘lone wolf incident’ as being described by most media organizations. Hasan had been taught the ideology that is being advocated by hundreds of Islamic scholars and Imams in the U.S. We as a country can continue to deny there are numerous Islamic leaders and their supporting organizations such as CAIR, ISNA, MSA, and MANA, to name a few, who advocate killing innocent men, women, and children whom they allege ‘oppress Islam.’

How many more incidents similar to this that have been occurring in America does it take before even the media wants to report the truth? ...
Gaubatz goes further. He even asserts that Hasan, an American soldier, is a terrorist:
Expect more. Israel has endured ‘suicide/attacks’ similar to this for many years. Malik Nabal Hasan is a terrorist supporting the ideology of Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, and yes, CAIR. In Palestine, the leaders send out the young and vulnerable to carry out the murders in the name of Islam. The same is happening in America.
Is Glazov for real? How can he justify making a connection between Hasan's alledged actions and Al Qaeda's "ideology"?

The truth is that it does not matter to the kind of mindset that Gaubatz appeals.

Complexity and details are not what he is seeking to uncover. Rather his instinct is to caste Islam and Muslims in one ludicrous and prejudicial net.

His effort is lauded by his interviewer, Jamie Glazov, who ends the interview saying " ... thank you ... for your courage to tell the truth, and for standing up for America."

How is this fool "standing up for" anything other than to race/hate bait against Islam and Muslims?

Islam does not condone the massacre at Fort Hood. There is nothing in the Qur'an that tells Muslims to kill Christians, Jews, or anyone else in the way of jihad.

But does that really matter when the anti-Islam/Muslim prejudices and hatred that drives the thinking of right-wing folks like Gaubatz is a fait accompli?

And there is more in the same publication under the oh so predictable headline "Jihad at Fort Hood".

The author, Robert Spencer, is a self-constructed 'expert' on Islam.

Spencer complains that the mainstream media in the US is not telling 'the truth' about what Major Hasan is said to have done at Fort Hood.

He supposedly sets the record straight with his 'deft' observation on Hasan's "motive".

He says in part:
Major Hasan’s motive was perfectly clear — but it was one that the forces of political correctness and the Islamic advocacy groups in the United States have been working for years to obscure. So it is that now that another major jihad terror attack has taken place on American soil, authorities and the mainstream media are at a loss to explain why it happened – and the abundant evidence that it was a jihad attack is ignored.
And the reason that "it happened" is according to this 'scholar' a matter of knowing that Islam preaches violence and Muslims are instructed to attack those who oppose them.

Same old nonsense and tired reasoning that would be laughable were it not for the serious danger it poses.

Inside of these two articles Frontpage Magazine is propagating racist hatred against Islam and Muslims and is doing so recklessly.

The charges against Major Hasan are alleged at this stage. This means that he has the constitutional right to a fair trial and his guilt will be established within these parameters.

The relationship that his actions have on Islam or any other Muslim is merely a matter of contrived guilt by association.

Mehdi Hassan of the New Statesman quite rightly describes folks like Robert Spencer (and I include Dave Gaubatz) as:
" ... nasty, divisive and Islamophobic bigots who take whatever opportunity, whatever tragedy, they can to stir up hatred against Muslims and Islam in the west."
These racist Islam haters would not attribute the same kind of motives to Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, as pointed out by a comment on Mehdi Hassan's article.

McVeigh served in the US Army and said his actions were aimed at bringing down the US government.

He massacred 168 people and his act remains the deadliest terrorist attack by an American citizen directed at the US government.

The fact that there were also religious (Roman Catholic) motivations given for his bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, hardly moved right-wing folks to condemn Christianity and call the Bible a subversive and terrorist document.

But then impulse to draw Islam and Muslims as jihadists/terrorists is derived from a long history of racism that is as old as the US.

So the inevitable is well on its way. I called it below and so it is.

I remember that in the frantic moments after the Oklahoma bombing their were reports that Muslims/Arabs were the perpetrators.

The reports claimed that Israel had credible evidence to prove this assertion.

Not so. Yet even as the US struggled to come to terms with the bombing there were attacks against Muslims and folks who looked like they 'could be' Muslims.

The same was true of 9/11.

Just days after that horrid series of attacks in 2001, a white right-wing thug walked into a convenience store in Arizona and killed a Sikh man, Balbir Singh Sodhi, because he looked Muslim.

How dumb yet so tragic in consequence?

Right-wing commentators and conservatives in general would do well to interrogate the rise of terrorism within their own ranks before witch-hunting among Muslims.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has drawn attention to at least 75 "major terrorist plots and racist rampages that have emerged from the American radical right in the years since Oklahoma City."

The 'devil' may be closer than they want to admit.

These are the facts and yet again innocent lives hang in the racist (im)balance.

Onward!

Picture Credit

Friday, November 6, 2009

Fort Hood Massacre

As is the usual manner of the mainstream US media and its policy attachments, much will be said/made about this horrific incident in the moments, days, and months to follow.

The massacre comes at a time when President Obama looks more like his predecessor and the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are far from deescalating.

That said it should also be expected that much will be made about the alleged shooter, Major Nidal Malik Hasan (39), who is said to be an American born Muslim of Palestinian/Jordanian descent.

Major Hasan is suspected of taking 13 lives and wounding 30 others, as of this writing.

Though the story is still unfolding the Guardian reports that Major Hasan, a military psychiatrist, has in recent months grown increasingly "unhappy" in his career and has even been seeking to be honorably discharged.

The report says in part:
Unusually for a soldier, Hasan appeared to have little taste for violence, at least up until yesterday. His cousin, Nader Hasan, said: "He was someone who did not enjoy going to the firing range." That may have been a consequence of the stories he had heard in the hospital wards from the returning soldiers.

Hasan became an unhappy soldier as his career progressed, according to his family and colleagues.

Nader said his cousin, though born in America, had suffered harassment from fellow soldiers who questioned his loyalty to the US and commented on his Middle East ethnicity. As a Muslim, he was upset at the killing of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan, and Nader confirmed that he had been resisting deployment in either war zone.

He had been scheduled for deployment to Iraq at the end of the year and had told colleagues repeatedly he did not want to go. He felt trapped, looking at ways to buy his way out, even going to the extent of hiring a lawyer to see if he could leave military service honourably.
I expect that as Major Hasan, who is still alive according to a news report, is put on trial his co-accused will be all Muslims, particularly those living inside the US.

Racist questions about the compatibility of Islam inside American democracy and culture will resurface.

And from inside Muslim communities there will be persistent voices who will seek to demonstrate their loyalty to America over their misgivings about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I dare add that even as more Muslims were killed in American drone attacks in Pakistan yesterday the fixation will be on situating the US as the victim of Islam and its terrorists.

In addition to the horror that this massacre represents it is necessary to see the US inside of the absolute violence that it has perpetrated in the Middle East.

I have said it here before, Islam is not at war with the US, rather it is the US that is at war with Muslims (Islam).

And that war is not about ideology or even religion. It is about resources. Oil in short!

I left the US in 2005 after 23 years, most of my life. A big part of my decision was the fact that I could not live inside of, and pay taxes to, a state that was at war with innocent people who looked like me and mine.

I absolutely refused to adopt an apologetic silence/posture while the noise about Islam and terrorism was all about me.

Don't get me twisted though. I am not even trying to defend what happened today at Fort Hood. Nor am I trying to agitate that all Muslims have no option but to leave the US.

It should be said that there are many Americans of every persuasion who abhor and resist what the US government is doing in the Middle East and elsewhere.

I am, however, pressing the (my) reality that I could not continue to live with conscience, and pay taxes, to an ever expanding and warmongering empire.

At one early stage in my life I was drawn to the idea of America. But as I looked closer I saw that the idea never really passed being more than just an ideal.

As Satre said, America is a brute and brutal.

There is a lot more of a fallout to come and innocent lives will continue to be spent.

And so the brutality of America/US continues ... one undoing dialectic at a time.

You simply can't run from your history ...

Onward!

Picture Credit

Thursday, November 5, 2009

What Does Obama Look Like After A Year In Office?

See Mehdi Hasan's (New Statesman Senior Political Editor) "Change we can’t believe in" and his most recent article "Obama's first year -- good or bad?".

Same game and same crap is my thinking.

Onward!

Picture Credit

"Italy Convicts Former CIA Agents in Renditions Trial"

MILAN - An Italian judge sentenced 23 former CIA agents to up to eight years in prison Wednesday for the abduction of a Muslim cleric in a symbolic ruling against "rendition" flights used by the former U.S. government.

The Americans were all tried in absentia after the United States refused to extradite them. But the verdict, the first of its kind, was welcomed by rights campaigners who have long complained the renditions policy violated basic human rights.

Judge Oscar Magi dropped the case against three Americans, including a former CIA Rome station chief, for the abduction of Egyptian-born cleric Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr (pictured), who was snatched off a Milan street in 2003 and flown to Egypt for interrogation.

He also acquitted the former head of Italy's Sismi military intelligence service, Nicolo Pollari, and his former deputy, ruling that evidence against them violated state secrecy rules.

Magi sentenced the former head of the CIA's Milan station, Robert Seldon Lady, to eight years in prison and the other 22 former CIA agents to five years each.

He ruled that those convicted should paid 1 million euros in damages to Nasr, better known as Abu Omar, and 500,000 euros to his wife.

Abu Omar was secretly flown from Aviano airbase in northeast Italy via Ramstein base in Germany to Egypt, where he says he was tortured and held until 2007 without charge.

It is the first case of its kind to contest the practice of "extraordinary rendition" under the administration of former U.S. President George W. Bush, in which terrorism suspects were captured in one country and taken for questioning in another, where interrogation techniques were tougher.

(Reporting by Emilio Parodi and Daniel Flynn; writing by Daniel Flynn)© 2009 Reuters

Article Source
COMMENT: A great start indeed. It must be noted though that there is evidence that the practice of "rendition" continues under President Obama.

Picture Credit

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Louisiana Justice Who Won't Marry Mixed Race Couples Quits

A Louisiana justice of the peace who refused to marry a couple because the bride was white and groom was black resigned Tuesday, after weeks of refusing to step down despite calls for his ouster from officials including the governor.

Keith Bardwell quit with a one-sentence statement to Louisiana Secretary of State Jay Dardenne and no explanation of his decision: “I do hereby resign the office of Justice of the Peace for the Eighth Ward of Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana, effective November 3, 2009.”

Gov. Bobby Jindal called Bardwell’s resignation “long overdue.”

Bardwell, who is white, refused to marry Beth Humphrey and Terence McKay.

When questioned, Bardwell acknowledged he routinely recuses himself from marrying interracial couples because he believes the marriages harm the couples’ children. In interviews, he said he refers the couples to other justices of the peace, who then perform the ceremony, which happened in this case.
Read the rest of the NY Daily News article here.

And I was thinking we was free up there ;)

Onward!

Picture/Story Credit

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Don't Ask

"Which country in Africa is home to the largest population", I asked the young bright face in front of me.

"China", she shouted back almost instantly.

I looked at her with a smile borrowed from years of experience with young undergraduate students.

"Are you sure?", I asked.

"Yes I am because they have more than a billion people there", she insisted.

"But China is not on the African continent", I said.

She looked back with a furrowed brow as a slow smile of recognition crept over her face.

"Oh yes that is true ... China is more like in Europe", she declared.

"Right ... and China's capital city would be Lagos, right?", I said.

"I don't know but is this question going to be on our final exam", she asked somewhat exasperated.

"No it won't be on your exam. I'll stick with the easier questions on foreign policy formulation and implementation", I replied.
My head hurts!

Wonder what Mita is doing at home?

Onward! ... if even slowly.

Image Credit

Monday, November 2, 2009

Mita

A good few years ago I started my first Mexican vacation in Punta Mita, a small resort town about 26 miles North of Puerto Vallarta.

I stayed at a local hotel that was nothing fancy but it was not too bad. My travel companion could speak Spanish so getting around town was a lot easier than my subsequent solo trips.

I've read that Punta Mita has undergone a lot of development since my visit.

AnyHowze, I got to thinking about Punta Mita not because I miss the place or my travel companion.

Nope. My most treasured memory is of a kitten that hung around my hotel. She was perhaps the friendliest cat I have ever known.

She followed me around the hotel for the entire week. The owner did not claim the kitten, in fact, no-one even knew how she came to live at the hotel.

I grew so attached to her that I started to plot ways to sneak her across the US border.

I began calling her Mita and she would respond.

In the mornings I'd open the doors to our large living space and Mita would be there to play and, of course, eat the goodies we offered.

I left Punta Mita without Mita. My heart was heavy but I was consoled by the fact that she had a home and lots of other folks to befriend.

Last night I made it back from a long weekend in Kimberley and the usual angst about being here started to set in.

My colleague who lives adjacent to me stopped by and started mumbling about a kitten that was close to death and wandering around our common areas.

When he left I walked him home and cast an eye around.

He said he was worried that someone might drive over her and he wanted to leave some milk out but did not know where to do so.

At about that moment I heard this faint meow and I turned to see this very small fur ball walking over to me.

Now I know that Ferrel cats, even kittens, will not allow you to pick them up. Well that has been my experience.

Nonetheless, I bent over and said "come here little one" and she walked right into my hands.

My colleague said, "now you have a new friend so take her to your house."

I carried the fur ball over to my townhouse and gave her milk and tuna fish. She was hungry.

If you did not know you would think that the kitten and I knew each other well.

She settled into my place and settled into me.

Sometime really early this morning I opened my eyes and watched her fast asleep on my chest.

My heart beat probably reminded her of her moms. She barely stirred all night even when I got up.

Before leaving for work I carried her downstairs, she is too small for the stairs, and she ate again and even went into the garden to do her business.

She reminds me of Mita from Punta Mita and I have started to call her Mita too.

She follows me around the house and right now I expect she is curled up somewhere on my couch.

In a way Mita has come home. :)

Onward!

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

McDonald's Quits Iceland

This 'breaking' story caused me to remember a few hours I spent at Iceland's Keflavik International Airport, in Reykjavík, several years ago.

While I waited to board my Sabina Airlines connection to Brussels I recall seeing a sign for a butcher shop.

Why would anyone buy meat at an airport I thought?

So I moseyed over to the shop and looked around for a spell.

It seems that Iceland is one of the few, perhaps even the only, international destination where you can buy an assortment of meat like dill marinated salmon, dried cod, dried/salted shark, and frozen lamb meat, at the airport.

The butcher will package your meat parcel and you can check it in with your bags.

I imagine that flying into the US could be quite a hassle unless I am missing something.

I know they have biltong (beef jerky) sniffer dogs at JFK that check luggage arriving from South Africa. :)

AnyHowze, if you must have a Big Mac in Iceland then you may want to bring one along the next time you visit.

The same is true for Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Here in Mzansi, unlike Iceland, McDonald's seems to be thriving profitably alongside an array of local fast food joints and the consequences are quite visible.

We are distinctively a racially polarized nation with strikingly similar girth dimensions.

Mmmmmm ;)

I'm off for a few days. Later!

Image Credit

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Pentagon Bans Chomsky's Book

By Sherwood Ross
26 October, 2009
Countercurrents.org
The Pentagon has paid anti-war activist Noam Chomsky the highest honor any totalitarian entity can bestow upon an author: they’ve banned his book “Interventions” at Guantanamo Bay prison.

They won’t say precisely why they “honored” Chomsky, but Navy spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Brook DeWalt told the Miami Herald that “Interventions”(City Lights Books) might negatively “impact on (Gitmo’s) good order and discipline.”

The Pentagon, of course, insists on “good order and discipline” running its prison camp. Chomsky likes order, too. What he objects to is the Pentagon spreading disorder globally.

Instead of thanking the Pentagon for his “honor,” Chomsky, is said to be angry. The Herald quotes him as saying, “This happens sometimes in totalitarian regimes.”
Read the rest of the article here.

Picture Credit

Monday, October 26, 2009

Jansen Wants To Talk

Jonathan Jansen and his management team at the University of the Free State (UFS) are reportedly offering an "olive branch" to their critics.

Jansen has released this statement:
"All stakeholders inside and outside the UFS are invited to meet with the university management to table their concerns and to try to find consensus on a way forward."
Interesting.

So who would be the "stakeholders" then? All South Africans?

I am amused.

The selected Prince and his apartheid principality are found waffling.

And so it should be.

The victims in this case should be thinking about a law suite against Jansen and the UFS.

Such a civil suite must seek significant recompense for the added stress and humiliation brought on by Jansen and his principality.

Nothing funny about real confrontation and redress Professor Jansen.

That is the "way forward"!

Onward!

Friday, October 23, 2009

Zapiro on Jonathan Jansen

Saying more than words can!

Credit

A Friday Smile

Mooi seems to think that our next adventure should be to Pakistan. We came close to Pakistan in 06/07 but not close enough obviously.

The pictures below are from a forward Mooi sent to me entitled "Only in Pakistan".

I can't verify anything. But I thought it might make ya smile ;)




By the way, Mooi has just published a book in which he documents much of his travel experiences as a Guru of all religions.

I'm thinking Zanzibar in December! Pakistan is not the place to be right now, sadly.

What ya say Guru? We can develop our disagreement over Sai Baba on a sunny beach.

Hell I can't resist one more pic from the forward!


Have a wonderful and peaceful Friday.

Jumua Mubarak!

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

John Pilger: "War Is Peace, Ignorance Is Strength"

... Obama, the smooth operator from Chicago via Harvard, was enlisted to restore what he calls "leadership" throughout the world. The Nobel Prize committee's decision is the kind of cloying reverse racism that has beatified the man for no reason other than he is a member of a minority and attractive to liberal sensibilities, if not to the Afghan children he kills. This is the Call of Obama. It is not unlike a dog whistle: inaudible to most, irresistible to the besotted and boneheaded. "When Obama walks into a room," gushed George Clooney, "you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere."

The great voice of black liberation Frantz Fanon understood this. In The Wretched of the Earth, he described the "intermediary [whose] mission has nothing to do with transforming the nation: it consists, prosaically, of being the transmission line between the nation and a capitalism, rampant though camouflaged". Because political debate has become so debased in our media monoculture - Blair or Brown; Brown or Cameron - race, gender and class can be used as seductive tools of propaganda and diversion. In Obama's case, what matters, as Fanon pointed out in an earlier era, is not the intermediary's "historic" elevation, but the class he serves. After all, Bush's inner circle was probably the most multiracial in presidential history. There was Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas, all dutifully serving an extreme and dangerous power. ...
Read the rest of this New Statesman article here

Monday, October 19, 2009

Jansen's Usual Drivel

I want to like Jonathan Jansen but he makes it almost impossible most times.

In the past I have written here that Jansen is "a prodigious kisser of white ass" only to edit those words because I worried that I was not being fair.

I guess there are times when my will to say as I please must be tempered.

But then again I have not really been one to mince words irrespective of the fallout.

Jonathan Jansen, as you know, is the first black vice-chancellor of the University of the Free State (UFS) since apartheid ideology brought it to life.

That he was chosen by the 'herrenvolk' who still run that institution is telling.

I was, therefore, not shocked to learn that he decided to drop the charges and cook up some contrived contextualization that essentially robs the black victims of a fuller redress in a criminal court.

Jansen is adept at playing racial politics to seem as if he is addressing wider concerns about fairness, equality, and justice, among other concerns.

Take for example a recent media article where he comments on skin discrimination and race essentialization in post-apartheid South Africa.

His article is entitled "Our Troubles Are Still Skin Deep" and it deals in part with a movie about a white girl who appeared coloured.

The movie was shown on the UFS campus and the audience participated in a discussion afterward.

Jansen comments on some of the audience discussion and defies his own logic by racializing the commentators and their individual comments.

In so doing, he appears to berate black students for their 'usual' responses.

He also addresses the absence of white students at the screening by saying that they would be victimized by blacks and made to feel guilty for their parents deeds.

His reasoning betrays a nuanced understanding of post-apartheid racism.

I don't think Jansen is stupid enough not to know what he is doing. I think he is deliberate in the well worn manner that many liberals are when faced with racism.

He knows the game very well.

When it suites him he will elevate individual racism over institutional racism.

Where it does not, like in the Reitz case, he hides the complicity of four white thugs behind the issue of institutional racism.

Either way, he softens the gaze on whiteness and its excesses.

In short, I am now absolutely convinced that his political purpose can be crudely summed up by my kissing comment above.

His Reitz decision is nothing short of a betrayal.

Jansen's nonsense about a need for reconciliation at UFS merely advances his standing among his chosen volk.

Nothing can come out of denial and he must not be seen to be anything more than a selected leader who promotes the consensus that black life is worth less than white life.

If he was more than just another lackey of whiteness he would remember that the Soweto Riots of 1976 demonstrated the will of black folk not to be taught in the language of the oppressor.

The fact that he has now decided that part of his reconciliation efforts is to force Afrikaans on black students demonstrates the political substance of Jansen.

The ball is now in the court of the Minister of Higher Education, Dr. Blade Nzimande, to set aside Jansen's usual drivel.

Onward!

Picture Credit

UPDATE (October 20): "Jansen clarifies Reitz statement"

Seems Jansen needs to let you know that UFS is "simply" dropping its complaint against the Reitz 4 but that criminal charges and human rights charges are still pending at the Directorate of Special Prosecutions and the Human Rights Commission, respectivley.

Additionally, in a move that adds to the idiocy of doing advertisements for ABSA (the bank owned by the incalcitrant former slave trading Barclays Bank), Archbishop Tutu has come out in support of Jansen's decision.

I am starting to believe that the Arch is losing his damn mind!

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Not In Obama's America

The caption to this picture from the Mail & Guardian reads: "A family who had left their village in Waziristan along the Afghan border arrive at Dera Ismail Khan on Wednesday. The military is gearing up for an offensive against Taliban strongholds in the area. (Ishtiaq Mahsud, AP)"

Barry and his family are safe and secure.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Sticks And Stones

Caption from News24 reads: "Residents of Sakhile near Standerton in Mpumalanga protest over poor service delivery and corruption. (Sapa)"

'Just another day in our post-apartheid paradise'.

Picture Credit

Bloggerversary

Erica reminded me a few days ago that this ol' blog is about to turn three years old.

Truth be told I could not remember if it was two or three. But yeah, tomorrow marks a brother's third year of writing here.

This is post number 623 but there are at least another fifty or so posts that have been taken down for this or that reason.

Thanks for reading me here. Thanks especially for the patience through spotty and testy times.

I said that I would write here as long as it feels right.

It still does.

Peace and struggle to youse.

Onward!

PS. The picture above was taken shortly after I started the blog in a tearoom in New Delhi called "Passion Tea" ... that green chair is the exact place where my first post came to be :)

Monday, October 12, 2009

Free State University And The "Unifinished Business" Of Racism

In early January 2008 South Africans had to confront, again, the ongoing and "unfinished business" of apartheid and its brand of racism.

Around that time a group of white Afrikaner students made a video to protest the integration of campus housing at the University of the Free State in South Africa's judicial capital, Bloemfontein.

The video was made public when the ex-girlfriend of one of the young men posted it to YouTube as a kind of revenge.

The 10 minute video makes racist fun of black workers who attend to the residences where the group of Afrikaner students lived.

One scene shows a young man urinating into a pot of food which is then given to the unsuspecting workers to eat.

The British newspaper, The Times, carried an article this past Sunday that refers to the pending criminal court case and it covers the fist public interviews with the affected workers pictured below.


Here in South Africa the case is mostly out of public view but hardly anyone who pays relative attention can forget its contents.

Our apartheid past is too close and too personal for the majority to forget.

I have written here and in my academic work about the need to confront the past and our memories.

But as I read the statements of the workers who are at the center of this case I was pressed to recognize, again, that the past is hardly in the past.

For the majority the past and the present are linked by persistent impoverishment and structural distance from what is supposed to be the new era.

As a result too many are left "invisible" in the dominant post-era narrative that seeks to chart progress.

One of the workers best describes the unavoidable tension that ensues in this way:
"I was invisible to everyone before this video happened, but after it came out politicians wanted to speak to me. I met the rector for the first time. We were given tea in his office. My family was hounded by the South African media. I am not an educated woman, but I knew I was being used. Collectively we made a decision to step away from this incident. We stayed away from the university for a short while, but we all kept our jobs, we all went back to work together, although we were moved to another hostel.

We saw those boys in a different way to how they saw us ... I treated them like sons. I cleaned up their hostel and joked with them. I told them off if they made too much of a mess. We helped them when they first came into the hostel. They were young, nervous, we made them tea. They betrayed us. Stuck a knife into our hearts. We were not as intelligent as them, so they manipulated us. They told us they were playing a game.

I don’t have anger in my heart, but I understand injustice. I have travelled to work at that university for over 25 years. I see black students on campus. I see their hope and ambition. My own daughter aspires to go to university. But for me, the way I am treated, that hasn’t changed. My pastor told me that God wanted me to fight against injustice and that is why I became involved in this legal matter. He also asked me to forgive those boys, but it is not them I wish to forgive. It is their parents, for they made them that way.”
These words are haunting and their relevance at this historical moment should weigh heavy on our collective consciousness.

There is a lot of "unfinished business" that must be confronted.

This means that even while President Zuma, like Obama, may want to shy away from confronting race and racism, the nation simply cannot.

The stakes are too high.

Ignorance, denial, selective memory, and forgetting are not the ingredients of meaningful progress and nation-building.

We must double our efforts to confront racism and its class and gender intersections if we are to move toward collective freedom.

Onward!

Picture Credit